By: Navy plan to allow same-sex marriage on bases draws opposition - Page 13 - Christian Forums

Fri, 13 May 2011 05:50:11 +0000

[...] Southern Baptist Convention Resolution [...]

By: Repealing DADT: Progress of a Sort- Political Op-Ed « Whiskey Round Table

Repealing DADT: Progress of a Sort- Political Op-Ed « Whiskey Round Table — Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:57:27 +0000

[...] grossly misrepresentative title—is of Judeo-Christian origins. For example, both the Southern Baptist Convention and the Roman Catholic Church have openly called for the US government to preserve “don’t ask, [...]

By: Alexandra

Alexandra — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:08:15 +0000

It appears that the study does not include understanding of human sexuality in general and a will under duress to force this irresolute agenda down our throats. Presently a gay not admitting he is gay is lying and an invasion of personal privacy of the person he or she shares a barracks with. Just as a man fakes being a woman then shares a barrack with a female. On the other hand gays cannot have it both ways to interject identifying themselves as gay then to follow disregard to the category of selected sexuality and then have them cohabitate in the military and also honor exclusive marriage in the future. Eliminating adultery and the normal standards we govern. Disallow male/ female cohabitation in the barracks and in theater and then to permit gay with gay or bisexual to cohabitate. It’s a predjudice and favortism and permissive demonstration of poor behavior and ethics. America does accept the notion of homosexuality however, it seems gays want special rules to conduct themselves and engage into sexuality outside the limits of standard rules of human sexuality and respect for gender sexuality, meanwhile they want us to forget about it when living in quarters and become just one of the guys. This plan is worse than the wrap up plan for Iraq, inclusion without a rational plan and funding which will be huge. They expect members preparing for an active deployment to also take the time to be tolerance brainwashed with non mission oriented agenda for force readiness. They want to be the exclusive exception to the rule of cohabitation, however taken serious at the same time as a valid lifestyle and potential exclusive marriage. They can’t have both.

The issue many Christians have is force cohabitaion and the Bilical story of Lot. The Southern Baptist Convention is not very happy this idea of forced cohabitation outside of marriage and there is an estimate that 28% will not re-enlist over the forced cohabitation issues among christian service members who may not even participate in cohabitation outside of marriage even in a male female cohabitation. Sexuality is sexuality and as a standard it’s not mixed in the barracks. So if it is a sexual identity then treat it as such and respect the privacy of everyone including gays as such and remove again the irresolute agenda that is being implied.

Including gays would be accompanied by a great expense in ensuring that the privacy and personal safety will be practiced according to sexuality preference. They cannot mix and want marriage and all the identification and customs of a sexual identity and acceptable human interaction.

By: Southern Baptist Convention Resolutions Round-Up, Part 1 | the big daddy weave

Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:15:46 +0000

[...] On Homosexuality and the United States Military [...]

By: big daddy weave

big daddy weave — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:13:55 +0000

The resolution itself suggests support for status-quo. Although I’m sure SBC leaders wouldn’t mind a return to a pre-1993 view.

By: Rick Bennett

Rick Bennett — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:54:47 +0000

I usually lose steam about 2/3 through any resolution due to the language.

So, do you see the resolution as wanting status quo on DADT or wanting to move to a pre1993 view. It looks like the resolution calls for that.