<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SBC Pivoting Toward A New Future? Hardly.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2010/06/sbc-pivoting-toward-a-new-future-hardly.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2010/06/sbc-pivoting-toward-a-new-future-hardly.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sbc-pivoting-toward-a-new-future-hardly</link>
	<description>News &#38; Commentary About All Things Baptist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2010/06/sbc-pivoting-toward-a-new-future-hardly.html#comment-55676</link>
		<dc:creator>K Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=2390#comment-55676</guid>
		<description>Resolutions:  good if one agrees with them, bad if one doesn&#039;t.

Meanwhile a federal district judge in Massachusetts has declared the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional as applied in Mass.  His opinion (based on the 10th Amndt., ironically) is a stretch, IMO, but this is where the trajectory -- including the repeal of don&#039;t ask don&#039;t tell -- logically leads. 

SBC seems to understand this.  Some other Baptist organizations see this as well but from the other side; they might fully support repealing DOMA. Still others use the Baptist idea of autonomy to say, in effect, whatever the government does is not the church&#039;s domain: we as a body are apolitical or, alternatively, issue no group statements because we respect everyone&#039;s individual autonomy and freedom of conscience.  

This is an age-old church-y argument.  It&#039;s pretty important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resolutions:  good if one agrees with them, bad if one doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Meanwhile a federal district judge in Massachusetts has declared the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional as applied in Mass.  His opinion (based on the 10th Amndt., ironically) is a stretch, IMO, but this is where the trajectory &#8212; including the repeal of don&#8217;t ask don&#8217;t tell &#8212; logically leads. </p>
<p>SBC seems to understand this.  Some other Baptist organizations see this as well but from the other side; they might fully support repealing DOMA. Still others use the Baptist idea of autonomy to say, in effect, whatever the government does is not the church&#8217;s domain: we as a body are apolitical or, alternatively, issue no group statements because we respect everyone&#8217;s individual autonomy and freedom of conscience.  </p>
<p>This is an age-old church-y argument.  It&#8217;s pretty important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Southern Baptist Convention: Pivoting Toward a New Future or Shooting Itself in the Foot? &#171; Deep in the Heart&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2010/06/sbc-pivoting-toward-a-new-future-hardly.html#comment-55369</link>
		<dc:creator>The Southern Baptist Convention: Pivoting Toward a New Future or Shooting Itself in the Foot? &#171; Deep in the Heart&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=2390#comment-55369</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2010/06/sbc-pivoting-toward-a-new-future-hardly.html [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2010/06/sbc-pivoting-toward-a-new-future-hardly.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2010/06/sbc-pivoting-toward-a-new-future-hardly.html</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

