Skip to Content
the big daddy weave

News & Commentary About All Things Baptist

Search for specific content:
Browse content by category:

Texas Baptist Congressman Admits to Yelling ‘Baby Killer’

The member of the United States House of Representatives who shouted “baby-killer” while Rep. Bart Stupak was speaking has unveiled himself.  He is Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R) of Texas’ 19th congressional district which includes Abilene and Lubbock.  Neugebauer is a member of First Baptist Church Lubbock, Texas – a congregation affiliated and active in the Baptist General Convention of Texas.

Here is the statement released by Rep. Randy Neugebauer:

“In the heat and emotion of the debate, I exclaimed the phrase ‘It’s a baby killer’ in reference to the agreement reached by the Democratic leadership,” Neugebauer said in the statement. “While I remain heartbroken over the passage of this bill and the tragic consequences it will have for the unborn, I deeply regret that my actions were mistakenly interpreted as a direct reference to Congressman Stupak himself.”

“I have apologized to Mr. Stupak and also apologize to my colleagues for the manner in which I expressed my disappointment about the bill. The House Chamber is a place of decorum and respect. The timing and tone of my comment last night was inappropriate.”

I guess one can take Neugebauer at his word that the “It’s a” preceded “Baby-Killer”

It wouldn’t be the first time though that an angry “pro-lifer” hurled “baby-killer” at someone whom they disagreed with…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
 — 

Discussion

  1. bapticus hereticus says:

    Seems plausible to me; I will give him the benefit of the doubt. With Stupak, passionate pro-lifer, before him, he might have been thinking (incorrectly, however), “But, Bart, it’s a baby killer.” Nonetheless, a sixty-year old man and governmental leader needs to possess better public, self-monitoring skills. If he has such, is it too much to expect that they be manifested? The apology, however, would have greater appeal if it were given last evening, instaed.

  2. Cat's Dad says:

    b h,

    Why is it being accepted by you and others at face value that the bill won’t fund abortions? If Stupak and ten of the other pro-life Dems were only satisfied when promised the executive order, then why do you assert that the bill is innocent?

    (There were other pro-life Dems who voted “no”.)

    Objectors who don’t believe the executive order will stand up against passed law have every reason to still assert, “It’s a baby killer!”

Join the Discussion




*Required


You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>