<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Errancy of Inerrancy: Bart Barber&#8217;s Critique of Jim Denison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/10/the-errancy-of-inerrancy-bart-barbers-critique-of-jim-denison.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/10/the-errancy-of-inerrancy-bart-barbers-critique-of-jim-denison.html</link>
	<description>News &#38; Commentary About All Things Baptist</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Dahl</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/10/the-errancy-of-inerrancy-bart-barbers-critique-of-jim-denison.html#comment-40294</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Dahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=2183#comment-40294</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, my eyes glaze over whenever someone starts into an inerrancy debate. In the end, it seems to become one of two things.

1) I believe the bible more than you do...

or

2) My interpretation is more right than yours.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, my eyes glaze over whenever someone starts into an inerrancy debate. In the end, it seems to become one of two things.</p>
<p>1) I believe the bible more than you do&#8230;</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>2) My interpretation is more right than yours.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Barber</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/10/the-errancy-of-inerrancy-bart-barbers-critique-of-jim-denison.html#comment-39678</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=2183#comment-39678</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, O Big Daddy.

I, too, think that it would advance the cause of scholarship for Denison to publish the paper in a more widespread fashion. I also recognize that my response itself is the legitimate target of critiques.

In case anyone reading is wondering, legal concerns prevented me from providing the text of Denison's paper on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, O Big Daddy.</p>
<p>I, too, think that it would advance the cause of scholarship for Denison to publish the paper in a more widespread fashion. I also recognize that my response itself is the legitimate target of critiques.</p>
<p>In case anyone reading is wondering, legal concerns prevented me from providing the text of Denison&#8217;s paper on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
