<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Errancy of Inerrancy: Bart Barber&#8217;s Critique of Jim Denison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/10/the-errancy-of-inerrancy-bart-barbers-critique-of-jim-denison.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/10/the-errancy-of-inerrancy-bart-barbers-critique-of-jim-denison.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-errancy-of-inerrancy-bart-barbers-critique-of-jim-denison</link>
	<description>News &#38; Commentary About All Things Baptist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Dahl</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/10/the-errancy-of-inerrancy-bart-barbers-critique-of-jim-denison.html#comment-40294</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Dahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=2183#comment-40294</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, my eyes glaze over whenever someone starts into an inerrancy debate. In the end, it seems to become one of two things.

1) I believe the bible more than you do...

or

2) My interpretation is more right than yours.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, my eyes glaze over whenever someone starts into an inerrancy debate. In the end, it seems to become one of two things.</p>
<p>1) I believe the bible more than you do&#8230;</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>2) My interpretation is more right than yours.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Barber</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/10/the-errancy-of-inerrancy-bart-barbers-critique-of-jim-denison.html#comment-39678</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=2183#comment-39678</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, O Big Daddy.

I, too, think that it would advance the cause of scholarship for Denison to publish the paper in a more widespread fashion. I also recognize that my response itself is the legitimate target of critiques.

In case anyone reading is wondering, legal concerns prevented me from providing the text of Denison&#039;s paper on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, O Big Daddy.</p>
<p>I, too, think that it would advance the cause of scholarship for Denison to publish the paper in a more widespread fashion. I also recognize that my response itself is the legitimate target of critiques.</p>
<p>In case anyone reading is wondering, legal concerns prevented me from providing the text of Denison&#8217;s paper on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

