The fight over school curriculum in Texas, recently focused on biology, has entered a new arena, with a brewing debate over how much faith belongs in American history classrooms.
The Texas Board of Education, which recently approved new science standards that made room for creationist critiques of evolution, is revising the state’s social studies curriculum. In early recommendations from outside experts appointed by the board, a divide has opened over how central religious theology should be to the teaching of history.
Three reviewers, appointed by social conservatives, have recommended revamping the K-12 curriculum to emphasize the roles of the Bible, the Christian faith and the civic virtue of religion in the study of American history. Two of them want to remove or de-emphasize references to several historical figures who have become liberal icons, such as César Chávez and Thurgood Marshall.
“We’re in an all-out moral and spiritual civil war for the soul of America, and the record of American history is right at the heart of it,” said Rev. Peter Marshall, a Christian minister and one of the reviewers appointed by the conservative camp.
Psuedohistorian David Barton and fundamentalist pastor Peter Marshall have suggested these changes to the Texas K-12 social studies standards:
- Replace Thurgood Marshall with Harriet Tubman or Sam Houston.
In first grade, students are expected to study the contributions of Americans who have influenced the course of history. Rev. Peter Marshall, a reviewer, calls Thurgood Marshall — who as a lawyer argued Brown v. Board of Education and later became the first black justice on the U.S. Supreme Court — a weak example.
- Delete Anne Hutchinson from a list of colonial leaders
Students learn about colonial history in the fifth grade, and three reviewers suggested that the standards not include Anne Hutchinson, a 17th century figure, among a list of significant leaders. Ms. Hutchinson was exiled from the Massachusetts Bay Colony for teaching religious views at odds with the officially sanctioned faith.
- Delete César Chávez from a list of figures who modeled active participation in the democratic process
Two reviewers objected to citing Mr. Chávez, who led a strike and boycott to improve working conditions for immigrant farmhands, as an example of citizenship for fifth-graders. “He’s hardly the kind of role model that ought to be held up to our children as someone worthy of emulation,” Rev. Marshall wrote.
- Replace references to America’s “democratic” values with “republican” values
Reviewer David Barton suggests swapping out “republican” for “democratic” in teaching materials. As he explains: “We don’t pledge allegiance to the flag and the democracy for which it stands.”
You can read the reviewers reports here.
For a good critique of Barton and Marshall, read this.
For an in-depth look at the “experts” that comprise this panel of reviewers, see here.










Brother BDW,
Why do you label David Barton a Psuedohistorian? How is that term different in quality from a historian?
I love Texans,….it is interesting how history in some cases is narrowed to include the motivations of the publishers. It appears that is where the battle is being waged.
Will it matter what history is more widely published and learned? I think so…
Thanks,
Chris
Barton writes Pseudohistory.
Pseudohistory defined:
“Pseudohistory is a pejorative term applied to texts which purport to be historical in nature but which depart from standard historiographical conventions in a way which undermines their conclusions. Works which make controversial conclusions based on new, speculative or disputed historical evidence, particularly in the fields of national, political, military and religious affairs, are often rejected as pseudohistory.”
Barton is also not a historian. His only degree is a B.A. in religious education.
Four of the six reviewers on the curriculum panel are respected academics including conservative Daniel Dreisbach of American University whom I have read/studied. Both Barton and Marshall, a Presbyterian minister, are not qualified to review and help update the social studies standards for public schools here in Texas.
Barton has even admitted that at least a dozen or so of his quotes from the Founding Fathers were fabricated.
http://www.members.tripod.com/candst/boston2.htm
Brother BDW,
I agree that if history is fabricated,…that would certainly defeat any reason to know it in that manner.
Since growing up in Texas and making my way through the public education system, this issue is always a hot topic. There may be good reason to have other qualified historians (non-fabricators), that understand a biblical world view, review and update the texts correctly.
As you know, there is plenty of fabrication to go around, whether historian authorized or not.
Blessings,
Chris
You would think that Anne Hutchinson would be a good example of a leader for religious freedom. However, since these folks want to determine which religion one is free to worship, I suppose she would not be good at all. Thurgood Marshall a poor example and replace democratic with republican? Recognizing this Barton fellow even as a pseud-historian is a stretch. I am an historian, by the way.
Chris, Barton has absolutely no academic qualifications or training as an historian. And it’s not that Texas panders to the publishers; it’s that the publishers are forced to change facts to bend to the ideological extremists who control our State Board of Education. The publishers would like to publish actual facts that are approved by actual experts, but they can’t.
Just to show you how bad it is, our House of Representatives voted AGAINST a measure that would have required all textbooks used in Texas public schools to present “medically accurate information.”
I cannot help but notice how slightly racist and sexist some of the proposed emendations are. I didn’t grow up in Texas, but I did grow up in public schools throughout the south and I was never taught about the amazing things Cesar Chavez did. It wasn’t until I moved to California that I learned about Chavez; deleting him out of a social studies curriculum altogether would be a tremendous loss.
Yea, I don’t think Chavez is going anywhere in Texas. There are parades that honor him here and around a dozen or so public schools are named after Chavez.
Brother Texas in Africa,
Being a native Texan, I completely understand…
I am not defending David B, btw. I was simply curious what the definition distinction was. I believe there are numerous qualified historians that understand a biblical world view.
I hope the textbooks continued to be improved.
Blessings,
Chris