<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadway &#038; the SBC: The Church Attorney&#8217;s Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/02/broadway-the-sbc-the-church-attorneys-perspective.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/02/broadway-the-sbc-the-church-attorneys-perspective.html</link>
	<description>News &#38; Commentary About All Things Baptist</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dwight crainshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/02/broadway-the-sbc-the-church-attorneys-perspective.html#comment-47876</link>
		<dc:creator>dwight crainshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=1900#comment-47876</guid>
		<description>Lynn, 
My guess is that I'm much older than you--my values may be a little stricter--approx. 30 years ago in NC ,at the request of the pastor and deacons ,I wrote a letter to the General Board,local board represenative and the local newspaper,concerning the liberal policies of a few Baptist churches
in NC--our view is that if you attend chuech long enough then you sin may become approved--like the sin of the week thing--I felt then that the open embrace of homosexuality is wrong and still do--I love the sinner but hate the sin--slowly we have come to absorb sinners of all
natures into the church--if this sin is an abomination to God--how can one continue to practice it.
Maybe I'm old fashioned but I think once we let the gate down,then we open the gates to all sins for approval at some point.
I personally would not want any sinner to feel unwelcome in my church--but realizing that without repentance he can't become a member.
I can't be admitted to the bar as an attorney until I meet certain requirements--same for the church--being  aborn again Christian is first--meaning that you have put off the old and started afresh with Jesus--we won't be perfect but we can't cling to the old--repentance is turning from the old to the new--doesn't work half way.
The old country song stated it pretty well--"if you don't stand for something-you'll fall for anything".

Dwight Crainshaw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynn,<br />
My guess is that I&#8217;m much older than you&#8211;my values may be a little stricter&#8211;approx. 30 years ago in NC ,at the request of the pastor and deacons ,I wrote a letter to the General Board,local board represenative and the local newspaper,concerning the liberal policies of a few Baptist churches<br />
in NC&#8211;our view is that if you attend chuech long enough then you sin may become approved&#8211;like the sin of the week thing&#8211;I felt then that the open embrace of homosexuality is wrong and still do&#8211;I love the sinner but hate the sin&#8211;slowly we have come to absorb sinners of all<br />
natures into the church&#8211;if this sin is an abomination to God&#8211;how can one continue to practice it.<br />
Maybe I&#8217;m old fashioned but I think once we let the gate down,then we open the gates to all sins for approval at some point.<br />
I personally would not want any sinner to feel unwelcome in my church&#8211;but realizing that without repentance he can&#8217;t become a member.<br />
I can&#8217;t be admitted to the bar as an attorney until I meet certain requirements&#8211;same for the church&#8211;being  aborn again Christian is first&#8211;meaning that you have put off the old and started afresh with Jesus&#8211;we won&#8217;t be perfect but we can&#8217;t cling to the old&#8211;repentance is turning from the old to the new&#8211;doesn&#8217;t work half way.<br />
The old country song stated it pretty well&#8211;&#8221;if you don&#8217;t stand for something-you&#8217;ll fall for anything&#8221;.</p>
<p>Dwight Crainshaw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Barber</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/02/broadway-the-sbc-the-church-attorneys-perspective.html#comment-18230</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=1900#comment-18230</guid>
		<description>I'm glad to react:

We cannot afford &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; to have a punitive action at this point because of the negative ramifications both in the public and between us as believers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to react:</p>
<p>We cannot afford <strong>not</strong> to have a punitive action at this point because of the negative ramifications both in the public and between us as believers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lowrie</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2009/02/broadway-the-sbc-the-church-attorneys-perspective.html#comment-17209</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lowrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=1900#comment-17209</guid>
		<description>BDW,

I tend to agree with you that Lyn may be confusing legal interpretation of a document with the sentiments and values of a living organism (the SBC in session). Based on my interpretation of the Ex Committee of the SBC proceedings, I believe they and probably the body at large have a much narrower view than Lyn's understanding.

The issue of membership and leadership vary from church to church. I believe there are pro-active healthy steps Broadway can take to address the issue and stay in friendly cooperation, but trying to stand on a technical interpretation of a constitution would not be firm footing in my book.

I am praying for all concerned, but it is critical that as Baptists we handle this matter in a way that promotes cooperation and understanding. We cannot afford a punitive action at this point because of the negative ramifications both in the public and between us as believers.

David Lowrie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BDW,</p>
<p>I tend to agree with you that Lyn may be confusing legal interpretation of a document with the sentiments and values of a living organism (the SBC in session). Based on my interpretation of the Ex Committee of the SBC proceedings, I believe they and probably the body at large have a much narrower view than Lyn&#8217;s understanding.</p>
<p>The issue of membership and leadership vary from church to church. I believe there are pro-active healthy steps Broadway can take to address the issue and stay in friendly cooperation, but trying to stand on a technical interpretation of a constitution would not be firm footing in my book.</p>
<p>I am praying for all concerned, but it is critical that as Baptists we handle this matter in a way that promotes cooperation and understanding. We cannot afford a punitive action at this point because of the negative ramifications both in the public and between us as believers.</p>
<p>David Lowrie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
