I’m in the slow process of making the switch to Word Press. I have a web host. I have a WordPress blog theme that I bought. But I had some problems transferring my Domain from Yahoo to Blue Host. Yahoo is taking their time. So, hopefully in 72 hours or less, http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com will take you to a new blog that I’ve yet to setup. I also don’t have a clue what I’m doing – so who knows!

I probably need to make one correction. I’m not a theology student.

My arguments are weak? Tell that to Douglas Kmeic. Unoriginal? Perhaps. No need to offer an original argument when a better one already had been made.

Augustine of Hippo (354-430):

“Sometimes, indeed, this lustful cruelty, or if you please, cruel lust, resorts to such extravagant methods as to use poisonous drugs to secure barrenness; or else, if unsuccessful in this, to destroy the conceived seed by some means previous to birth, preferring that its offspring should rather perish than receive vitality; or if it was advancing to life within the womb, should be slain before it was born.”

-De Nube et Concupiscentia 1.17 (15)

BDW, you must not assume that because I spend my days writing symphonies, I don’t know Church History. As a Bapto-Catholic composer, I must read it.

In the same way, nobody should assume that a theology student is sleeping during his classes because his arguments are weak.

When I employ the term “fundamentalist” and direct it towards individuals from Protestant denominations, I have rooted the term in its appropriate historical context. Carlos might need to brush up on his church history and the history behind the term fundamentalist. Phrases such as “Left-Wing Fundamentalist” are made-up terms. They have no historical context and often (as in this case) the user fails to define the term. From a historical point of view, a “Left-Winger” can’t be a fundamentalist. A “Left-Wing Fundamentalist” is a fine example of an oxymoron.

Now, should we give Carlos the Culture Warrior a cookie for affirming women? WOW.