These religious leaders need to quit condemning politicians’ campaigning ways and keep preaching.

Go over to Tim G.’s blog to see that conversation.

Sorry I helped to take your post off topic.

This letter issued to Clinton shows how much she is alienating herself from various leaders and groups (though I understand the signers of the letter do not intend to speak for anyone but themselves). It seems that she may have shot herself in the foot enough to tip the scales, but I have been wrong about that sort of thing before!

I don’t have a clue about what is going on behind the scenes at Baylor - who knows? Perhaps the tenure denial is unfair; like I said, I don’t know. But why are you, With that I am Peter, Tim R., and others in your camp so giddy about the coincidental denial of tenure for a woman professor at Baylor as though it has some bearing on the Patterson/Klouda discussion? If she were denied tenure BECAUSE she is a woman and if there weren’t several other female professors at Baylor, you might be on to something. But come on! Stop comparing apples and oranges.

i asked this over at peter lumpkins place, but i was afraid that it would get lost in the comment stream before you could respond. and, i’d really love to hear your response to this. i’m sorry if this is off topic. please forgive me. but, i wonder if you can shed light on us about a release from bp news. it seems that the president of baylor u. is denying tenure to a lot of professors there. it seems that even a woman prof. named dr. rene massengale was denied tenure even though she had a million dollar grant for her studies. and, the baylor powers that be arent giving the baylor prof’s denied tenure two years, but only one year, to find somewhere else to go.

why dont we hear from you and the enid crowd about baylor? where’s the outcry about baylor denying tenure to women prof’s?

david