<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Baptist Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/11/new-baptist-blogs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/11/new-baptist-blogs.html</link>
	<description>News &#38; Commentary About All Things Baptist</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barely a prof</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/11/new-baptist-blogs.html#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Barely a prof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=345#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>BDW,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm back and hoping to stay more active in the blogosphere.   Not ready to start my own, but your old man keeps telling me I should read/write more.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;thanks for the referral of other good Baptist sites.   Maybe it's just me as a novice, but the first article that popped up on moderatebaptist was dissing (rather naively I thought) the future of embryonic stem cell research.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;VERY volatile issue, but one that surely merits more than a quick, "told'ya" in stating that embryonic technology will never work (or, as i posted, did I just not get his attempt at irony/satire?).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyway, BDW Sr keeps proving his Bpatist chutzpah day in and day out at the work site.  Should be fun perusing your blogging buddies for what the Millenials think are "Baptist Distinctives".  I'm taking that on as an '08 research project.  I.e. comparing the traditional categories that your old man and I cut our teeth on, with what you guys 20 guys after us see as Baptist distinctives.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The times (and the verbiage) they are a-changin.  Atlanta should be fun, not the least of reasons will be the "rubbin up aginst each other" in our Baptist words and ways.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;SSadler (aka Barely a prof)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BDW,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m back and hoping to stay more active in the blogosphere.   Not ready to start my own, but your old man keeps telling me I should read/write more.</p>
<p>thanks for the referral of other good Baptist sites.   Maybe it&#8217;s just me as a novice, but the first article that popped up on moderatebaptist was dissing (rather naively I thought) the future of embryonic stem cell research.</p>
<p>VERY volatile issue, but one that surely merits more than a quick, &#8220;told&#8217;ya&#8221; in stating that embryonic technology will never work (or, as i posted, did I just not get his attempt at irony/satire?).</p>
<p>Anyway, BDW Sr keeps proving his Bpatist chutzpah day in and day out at the work site.  Should be fun perusing your blogging buddies for what the Millenials think are &#8220;Baptist Distinctives&#8221;.  I&#8217;m taking that on as an &#8216;08 research project.  I.e. comparing the traditional categories that your old man and I cut our teeth on, with what you guys 20 guys after us see as Baptist distinctives.</p>
<p>The times (and the verbiage) they are a-changin.  Atlanta should be fun, not the least of reasons will be the &#8220;rubbin up aginst each other&#8221; in our Baptist words and ways.</p>
<p>SSadler (aka Barely a prof)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/11/new-baptist-blogs.html#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=345#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>BDW, thanks for the shoutout and kind words.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I can't get my software to find your feed for mB.  Everyone else is working, but I just can't get yours to syndicate on there, yet I can read it in Google Reader by itself.  It's given me problems before...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BDW, thanks for the shoutout and kind words.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t get my software to find your feed for mB.  Everyone else is working, but I just can&#8217;t get yours to syndicate on there, yet I can read it in Google Reader by itself.  It&#8217;s given me problems before&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
