<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Myers Park To Challenge Messenger Seating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/11/myers-park-to-challenge-messenger-seating.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/11/myers-park-to-challenge-messenger-seating.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=myers-park-to-challenge-messenger-seating</link>
	<description>News &#38; Commentary About All Things Baptist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Daddy Weave</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/11/myers-park-to-challenge-messenger-seating.html#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Daddy Weave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=338#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not arguing on behalf of Myers Park.  Nor am I arguing that their autonomy as been violated.  I understand that the convention has the right to establish its own parameters.  However, as we are seeing with Tim Rogers&#039; proposed giving plan, &quot;conservatives&quot; will continue to enact policies that will effectively &quot;narrow the parameters of cooperation&quot; even further (to borrow a line from Wade Burleson).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But to reiterate, I do find it sad whenever any congregation with such a rich heritage as Myers Park is disfellowshipped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not arguing on behalf of Myers Park.  Nor am I arguing that their autonomy as been violated.  I understand that the convention has the right to establish its own parameters.  However, as we are seeing with Tim Rogers&#8217; proposed giving plan, &#8220;conservatives&#8221; will continue to enact policies that will effectively &#8220;narrow the parameters of cooperation&#8221; even further (to borrow a line from Wade Burleson).</p>
<p>But to reiterate, I do find it sad whenever any congregation with such a rich heritage as Myers Park is disfellowshipped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/11/myers-park-to-challenge-messenger-seating.html#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=338#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>I think you are off on this one. The convention&#039;s actions do not violate the automony of this church. The church has determined to be &quot;welcoming AND affirming&quot; of homosexuals and this will not change regardless of what the convention does. The convention has the right to establish its own membership parameters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are off on this one. The convention&#8217;s actions do not violate the automony of this church. The church has determined to be &#8220;welcoming AND affirming&#8221; of homosexuals and this will not change regardless of what the convention does. The convention has the right to establish its own membership parameters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

