Check out this interview/exchange between David Brody of the Christian Broadcasting Network and Barack Obama….
Brody Question: There is the so-called “religious left“ in this country that focuses primarily on social justice issues and there is the so-called “religious right” in this country that focuses more on personal salvation and the life and marriage issues. Some on the right believe that Evangelicals shouldn’t be the only ones moving left. Rather, the left needs to move toward the middle as well and not just put the focus on their issues. What is your plan to bring these two sides together?
Senator Obama: Well, these are difficult problems and there are no easy solutions. But I think that there are some lessons that both progressives and conservatives might learn. For progressives, I think we should recognize the role that values and culture play in addressing some of our most urgent social problems. As I’ve said many times before, the problems of poverty and racism, the uninsured and the unemployed aren’t simply technical problems in search of a ten-point plan. They’re rooted in both societal indifference and individual callousness - in the imperfections of man.
For example, I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities, and that our leaders must say so in the face of the gun manufacturers’ lobby. But I also believe that when a gang-banger shoots indiscriminately into a crowd because he feels somebody disrespected him, we’ve got a moral problem. There’s a hole in that young man’s heart - a hole that the government alone cannot fix. So solving these problems will require changes in government policy, but it will also require changes in hearts and a change in minds. I think progressives would do well to take this to heart.
For my friends on the right, I think it would be helpful to remember the critical role that the separation of church and state has played in preserving not only our democracy but also our religious practice. Folks tend to forget that during our founding, it wasn’t the atheists or the civil libertarians who were the most effective champions of the First Amendment. It was the persecuted minorities, it was Baptists like John Leland who didn’t want the established churches to impose their views on folks who were getting happy out in the fields and teaching the scripture to slaves.
It was the forbearers of Evangelicals who were the most adamant about not mingling government with religious, because they didn’t want state-sponsored religion hindering their ability to practice their faith as they understood it. Given this fact, I think that the right might worry a bit more about the dangers of sectarianism.
Whatever we once were, we’re no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of non-believers. We should acknowledge this and realize that when we’re formulating policies from the state house to the Senate floor to the White House, we’ve got to work to translate our reasoning into values that are accessible to every one of our citizens, not just members of our own faith community.
It’s refreshing to hear a candidate who can talk sincerely about faith and values while also endorsing the separation of church and state. Evangelicals and especially Baptists need to be reminded of their heritage as once persecuted minorities who opposed all government meddling in the affairs of the church. As Obama reminded us during the YouTube debate, we support the separation of church and state “not just for the state but also for the church, because that maintains our religious independence and that’s why we have such a thriving religious life.”
Related posts:
- Rep. John Lewis OFFICIALLY Endorses Barack Obama After endorsing Senator Clinton several months ago, my former...
- Texas Baptists Pass Resolution on Religious Liberty and the Faith-Based Initiative Here’s the text of the resolution titled On Religious Liberty...
- Barack Obama and the Pro-Abortion Myth Christianity Today has posted an interview with Democratic Presidential Candidate...
- People Of Faith For Barack Barack Obama’s campaign has launched a new website for its...
- Barack Obama and Reinhold Niebuhr I came across this post today, courtesy of Jesus Politics....
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
It is great to hear candidates talk about faith and values while endorsing separation between church and state, but Barack Obama did not do that. He did not say anything faithful or spiritual whatsoever. An atheist could have spoken Barak Obama’s words and been perfectly fine. It is fitting that the model leader of the religious right was Martin Luther King, Jr, who denied the virgin birth, the resurrection, and deity of Jesus Christ, and for whom the Bible was just a political document.
To find anything good for Christians in this interview you posted is suicidal for Christians. This man (Obama)only tells you what he wants you to hear, but he tells you enough to know that he is more for a one world religion than he is for Christianity. Higher education, even at seminaries, is no substitute for a sanctified life. Christians, if they are Christians, have lost sight of SALVATION as the only thing that matters in this life. Obama is following the same track as other godless men such as Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin. He is already in the process of nationalizing the banks and destroying religious liberty. Wake up and smell the coffee! Do you want the government to determine if you get a loan? The antichrist will cause that no man may buy or sell lest he take the mark of the beast (the government more or less) or the number of his name. If Obama is not the antichrist (I do believe that he is one of many antichrists), he sure is setting the stage for him. If you don’t wake up soon, you’ll have no Christian liberty. If you think that’s radical, you’re in the company of many Germans who thought the same thing in the 1930s.