<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dwight McKissic Gets Moraned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/02/dwight-mckissic-gets-moraned.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/02/dwight-mckissic-gets-moraned.html</link>
	<description>News &#38; Commentary About All Things Baptist</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2007/02/dwight-mckissic-gets-moraned.html#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=167#comment-706</guid>
		<description>Moran was the "master of misinformation" when he surfaced several years ago in the "Project 1000" push to take over the Missouri Baptist Convention.  There were people who were quick enough to locate information and prove him to be either completely inaccurate, or at least demonstrate that his way of presenting his "research" created an inaccurate and unreliable perspective.  However, back then, he was attacking those "liberals" who were "taking over" the SBC, so inaccuracy, inuendo, and misinformation were just tools get the right results.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now that the group divisions have shifted, the same methods are suddenly drawing sharp criticism. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Inuendo, inaccuracy, misinformation, fabrication, whatever you want to call a lie, is never right, regardless of what it is being used for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moran was the &#8220;master of misinformation&#8221; when he surfaced several years ago in the &#8220;Project 1000&#8243; push to take over the Missouri Baptist Convention.  There were people who were quick enough to locate information and prove him to be either completely inaccurate, or at least demonstrate that his way of presenting his &#8220;research&#8221; created an inaccurate and unreliable perspective.  However, back then, he was attacking those &#8220;liberals&#8221; who were &#8220;taking over&#8221; the SBC, so inaccuracy, inuendo, and misinformation were just tools get the right results.  </p>
<p>Now that the group divisions have shifted, the same methods are suddenly drawing sharp criticism. </p>
<p>Inuendo, inaccuracy, misinformation, fabrication, whatever you want to call a lie, is never right, regardless of what it is being used for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
