<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Joshua Convergence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-joshua-convergence</link>
	<description>News &#38; Commentary About All Things Baptist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWBTS Underground</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>SWBTS Underground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=84#comment-268</guid>
		<description>&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.abpnews.com/1388.article&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ABP Article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Weave,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Looks like we will be calling the shots as we see them.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Your Baptist cousin,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;underground</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a HREF="http://www.abpnews.com/1388.article" REL="nofollow">ABP Article</a></p>
<p>Weave,</p>
<p>Looks like we will be calling the shots as we see them.</p>
<p>Your Baptist cousin,</p>
<p>underground</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony K.</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=84#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Sorry to post a ling but what do you guys think of this? &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfNL5wqWk7w&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Message for &quot;Some&quot; Young Preachers from the Joshua Convergence!&lt;/a&gt; This is one video “highlight” from the event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to post a ling but what do you guys think of this? <a HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfNL5wqWk7w" REL="nofollow">A Message for &#8220;Some&#8221; Young Preachers from the Joshua Convergence!</a> This is one video “highlight” from the event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>D.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=84#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Peter, I think its a bit of a red herring to bring up Calvinists in this discussion, especially since the majority of those who identify themselves with the Founder&#039;s Movement are against any expansion of Landmarkism or any super-Biblical IMB guidelines (though as BDW pointed out, there are some Calvinists who view the IMB guidelines differently like Nathan Finn, and the Akin brothers).  But the suggestion that Calvinists need be &quot;dethroned&quot; is not only laughable, but completely overstated, especially when the official LifeWay report on Calvinism notes that only 10% of the convention identifies itself as holding to &quot;5-point Calvinism&quot;.  I think it is time to let the Calvinism thing rest.  I hear more about it on the blogosphere than I do at church, and I attend a Reformed SBC congregation with an SBTS professor as pastor!  If anything, Calvinism might be the glue that holds together the two sides, since Calvinists do not fear debate and they generally respect the Bible enough to take all opinions seriously and thus will engage dissenting views rather than just bashing them from the outside, which is exactly what we need here in the SBC.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BDW, &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t think this group constitutes any threat of an all out war and the suggestion that &quot;War seems inevitable&quot; is speculative at best and an extreme exageration at worst.  It is clear that some infighting is happening and some conservatives think that moderates are beginning to creep back into the convention.  I don&#039;t think that is the case though.  What will eventually happen here is that those who lead such a movement will be marginalized (remember Frank Page did get over 50% of the vote and he wasn&#039;t the household name) and the majority will once again control the SBC, just as it did during the years of the conservative resurgence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, I think its a bit of a red herring to bring up Calvinists in this discussion, especially since the majority of those who identify themselves with the Founder&#8217;s Movement are against any expansion of Landmarkism or any super-Biblical IMB guidelines (though as BDW pointed out, there are some Calvinists who view the IMB guidelines differently like Nathan Finn, and the Akin brothers).  But the suggestion that Calvinists need be &#8220;dethroned&#8221; is not only laughable, but completely overstated, especially when the official LifeWay report on Calvinism notes that only 10% of the convention identifies itself as holding to &#8220;5-point Calvinism&#8221;.  I think it is time to let the Calvinism thing rest.  I hear more about it on the blogosphere than I do at church, and I attend a Reformed SBC congregation with an SBTS professor as pastor!  If anything, Calvinism might be the glue that holds together the two sides, since Calvinists do not fear debate and they generally respect the Bible enough to take all opinions seriously and thus will engage dissenting views rather than just bashing them from the outside, which is exactly what we need here in the SBC.</p>
<p>BDW, </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this group constitutes any threat of an all out war and the suggestion that &#8220;War seems inevitable&#8221; is speculative at best and an extreme exageration at worst.  It is clear that some infighting is happening and some conservatives think that moderates are beginning to creep back into the convention.  I don&#8217;t think that is the case though.  What will eventually happen here is that those who lead such a movement will be marginalized (remember Frank Page did get over 50% of the vote and he wasn&#8217;t the household name) and the majority will once again control the SBC, just as it did during the years of the conservative resurgence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter lumpkins</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>peter lumpkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=84#comment-235</guid>
		<description>BDW,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I simply do not know...But, if Calvinists are on &quot;both sides&quot; as you indicate, perhaps that may just be the wedge to pry their loyality apart.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;With that, I am...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Peter&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;p.s.  Dave, you &amp; I must have had the same prof. for I was told virtually the same thing by my sys. theo. prof :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BDW,</p>
<p>I simply do not know&#8230;But, if Calvinists are on &#8220;both sides&#8221; as you indicate, perhaps that may just be the wedge to pry their loyality apart.  </p>
<p>With that, I am&#8230;</p>
<p>Peter</p>
<p>p.s.  Dave, you &#038; I must have had the same prof. for I was told virtually the same thing by my sys. theo. prof <img src='http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Danny Chisholm</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Danny Chisholm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=84#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Now that all the &quot;moderates&quot; have been exiled there is no one left to fight with except each other. There has to be an enemy to fight and a battle to win. This is textbook Fundamentalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that all the &#8220;moderates&#8221; have been exiled there is no one left to fight with except each other. There has to be an enemy to fight and a battle to win. This is textbook Fundamentalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Daddy Weave</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Daddy Weave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=84#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Peter,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;With Calvinists on both &quot;sides&quot; (so to speak), how do you foresee all that playing out if TJC is in fact the regrouping of the Conservative Resurgence?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;TJC is obviously a response to the election of Frank Page, the McKessic situation, and the apparent growing popularity of Wade Burleson.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The Establishment feels threatened and seems to be sending in the boys to spread their Loyalist message.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;War seems inevitable.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I just noticed that most of the info from the TJC website has been taken down except the purpose statement???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>With Calvinists on both &#8220;sides&#8221; (so to speak), how do you foresee all that playing out if TJC is in fact the regrouping of the Conservative Resurgence?</p>
<p>TJC is obviously a response to the election of Frank Page, the McKessic situation, and the apparent growing popularity of Wade Burleson.  </p>
<p>The Establishment feels threatened and seems to be sending in the boys to spread their Loyalist message.</p>
<p>War seems inevitable.</p>
<p>I just noticed that most of the info from the TJC website has been taken down except the purpose statement???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Bussey</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Bussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=84#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Great minds think alike.  I ran across their site earlier and I was disturbed.  Why is there always a battle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great minds think alike.  I ran across their site earlier and I was disturbed.  Why is there always a battle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=84#comment-231</guid>
		<description>If it weren&#039;t so true it might be funny. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One of my profs at Divinity School, who was a victim of the  takeover/resurgence (definintely &lt;i&gt;takeover&lt;/i&gt;)told us in 2ooo that it was only a matter of time before they turned on themselves. It seems there always has to be an &quot;enemy.&quot; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It appears that the &quot;tent&quot; of the SBC is definitely shrinking.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;ve enjoyed reading your commentary on Baptist life. Keep it up.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Blessings,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it weren&#8217;t so true it might be funny. </p>
<p>One of my profs at Divinity School, who was a victim of the  takeover/resurgence (definintely <i>takeover</i>)told us in 2ooo that it was only a matter of time before they turned on themselves. It seems there always has to be an &#8220;enemy.&#8221; </p>
<p>It appears that the &#8220;tent&#8221; of the SBC is definitely shrinking.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading your commentary on Baptist life. Keep it up.</p>
<p>Blessings,</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter lumpkins</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/2006/09/the-joshua-convergence.html#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>peter lumpkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebigdaddyweave.com/?p=84#comment-226</guid>
		<description>BigDaddyWeave,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t know...Dr. Reynolds does not strike me as a fighting fundamentalist--at least the breed with which I have dealt.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Do you think TJC is the regrouping of the Conservative Resurgence?  If so, I am afraid they will first have to dethrone the Calvinist Resurgence who feel themselves the rightful heir of their forefather.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Have a great morning.  With that, i am...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigDaddyWeave,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230;Dr. Reynolds does not strike me as a fighting fundamentalist&#8211;at least the breed with which I have dealt.  </p>
<p>Do you think TJC is the regrouping of the Conservative Resurgence?  If so, I am afraid they will first have to dethrone the Calvinist Resurgence who feel themselves the rightful heir of their forefather.</p>
<p>Have a great morning.  With that, i am&#8230;</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

